Featured Post

Make Your College Essay Talk Them Into Admitting You

Make Your College Essay Talk Them Into Admitting You This is a great guide, but people should be aware that these are just estimates. For...

Saturday, December 21, 2019

Manipulation of Truth in Oliver Stones JFK Essay

Manipulation of Truth in Oliver Stones JFK nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Oliver Stone is a master of manipulation. Being an expert in the art of directing, Stone is able to make an audience believe whatever he wishes. In the 1991 film JFK, Oliver Stone manipulates facts in order to convey a fictional conspiracy involving the assassination of John F. Kennedy. The Zapruder film and the magic bullet theory are two facts that Stone employs to trick the audience into believing his fabricated tale. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Stone unfolds this film through the eyes of Jim Garrison, the district attorney of New Orleans, who believes that there is more to the assassination than what has been presented in the†¦show more content†¦Stone does not alter the film in any way, keeping the original audio sounds in place. He does not attempt to again trick the audience into making false connections, but rather present the film in such a way that they will feel specific emotions of sadness, disgust, vulnerability, anger and a call to action. Stones goal is to make the viewers (both in the courtroom as well as the general audience watching the movie) want justice to be served, therefore, making them more willing to agree with Garrisons far-fetched theory. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Garrison dims the lights as an aura of apprehension fills the courtroom. Bystanders appear anxious and uncomfortable in the sullen darkness. Stone spends time focusing in on random viewers as they begin to show signs of discomfort such as fidgeting, fixing clothing and clasping hands. As the Zapruder film unfolds, Stone continues to flash scenes of these viewers. Cringing faces, squinting eyes and clenched fists exemplify the horrific effect that the film has on the audience. By showing the reactions of the bystanders, Stone forces a general audience to react in a similar way. Outside viewers empathize with the feelings of sadness, disgust and terror had by those within the courtroom. This act of vicarious compassion ultimately places Stone in the perfect position to persuade both audiences to believe Garrisons conjecture. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Stone quickly switches his means of manipulation afterShow MoreRelatedOliver Stones JFK1431 Words   |  6 Pages Oliver Stones JFK was a movie about the investigation by a district attorney, Jim Garrison, about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. JFK was one of the most controversial films of its time dealing with the decades-long debate about who actually killed President Kennedy. Was it done by the lone gunman Lee Harvey Oswald and his magic bullet that pierced through the bodies of the two men creating seven wounds? Or was it the end result of a detailed scheme masterminded by the MafiaRead MoreMovie Analysis : Hollywood 3558 Words   |  15 Pageswhat they see in films and television programs† and as a result, historical inaccuracies can occur, which distort history within the mind of the public. Historical films are often framed by their own time and place, which can blur the line between truth and fiction, as well as deluding t he audience with false facts. 300 by American film director Zack Snyder was produced and released in 2006. The movie is set in 480BC during the Battle of Thermopylae during the Second Persian invasion of Greece,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.